Management Memorandum
on
"Carrier Efficiency"
The following is a verbatim copy of a
recent Memorandum by the Manager, Post Office Operations of the San
Francisco
District. Any errors in dates etc. were made by the author, and have
not
been corrected!
(NOTE: "MPF"
= Minutes per foot)
December 24, 1996
MEMORANDUM FOR: POSTMASTERS, CITY
DELIVERY
OFFICES
SUBJECT: Carrier efficiency
As a group, we have the worst performance in
the
District relative to achieving the minimum acceptable productivity for
letter carriers of 15 MPF. Year-to-date we have used in excess
of
93,000 hours - the equivalent of 48 FT carriers - which are not
supported
by workload. These are hours that we cannot afford to be throwing away.
I am disappointed in you inability to date to
start turning this performance around. In AP 4 Wk 2 the average MPF for
all of you combined was 21.1 and the APTD is 20.3 MPF. This performance
is simply unacceptable. In order to force some action on your part, I
am
now defining some minimum requirements to address this performance
deficiency.
The following is effective immediately:
- You are to identify, by individual
carrier,
the worst
10% in terms of MPF performance. In calculating the 10%, use authorized
carrier complement and round up - for example, for Sunnyvale that means
20 carriers (total office) and for Belmont it means 4 carriers. In
multi-zone
offices, I expect 10% from each zone.
- You are to develop specific performance
improvement
plans for each of these carriers. These plans are to include, at a
minimum,
daily performance discussions, office counts, and street supervision.
If
you have trained route examiners in your office I also expect to see
3999's
completed, along with specific comments on office and street
performance.
- You are to provide me the names of the
individuals
selected, their current demonstrated MPF, and a copy of the plan
developed
to improve their performance.
- Each Friday you are to provide me a
summary
of actions
taken with each carrier identified and current demonstrated MPF for the
week.
Your initial plans (items 2 & 3 above) are
due
in my office by Friday, January 3, 1996. Your first weekly
reports
are due the following Friday, January 10, 1996. Please submit your
responses
via c:mail.
We have been talking about our poor carrier
efficiencies
since the first week of the Fiscal Year. I sincerely hope that many of
you have already identified your worst performers and begun the process
to improve their performance or take the necessary next steps. If not,
it is beyond time for you to start the process.
You and your supervisors have been provided
the
tools to manage the carrier performance for your office. I am simply
requiring
that you now use those tools.
(Signed)
Kathy Ainsworth
Manager, Post Office Operations
Go to Branch 214
Vice-President,
Bill Thornton's response!
Click here to view a REAL
"Minutes per Foot" chart based on 18 & 8
"Please
contact Officers or Stewards by phone or regular mail, and DO NOT use
email for important communications."
Our email system is regularly trying to deal with onslaughts of 'Spam',
and your important message may not reach its destination via email!
This page was last updated on: April 2, 2008
© September, 1996.
All rights reserved by
the webmaster and Branch 214. Permission is given
to trade unions and labor publications to copy information contained on
these pages, as long as appropriate recognition and notice is given to
the
author and webmaster
(Spence F. Burton). Permission to others must be granted in writing by
the President of Golden Gate Branch 214 and the webmaster . Copying of any
"graphics" contained on these pages is
also restricted by the preceding language (except for graphical links
to this page). This page was originally produced using Netscape Gold
Version 3.0, and is best viewed with Netscape Version 4.0 or better
at 1024 x 768 pixels! It was designed, constructed and is maintained by Spence F. Burton . Some of
these pages require the use of a "browser" that will display "tables"!
This page is JAVA enhanced! NB: Any link
contained on these pages, does not in any way imply that the linked
site is endorsed directly or indirectly by Golden Gate Branch 214 or
the webmaster. All "links" are for informational purposes ONLY!